True or False: When the Risk Assessor is charging per number of samples collected, it is important to sample intact painted surfaces that are not subject to friction or impact.

The statement is false because when assessing lead paint risks, collecting samples from intact painted surfaces that are not subject to friction or impact is important. Intact surfaces are generally less likely to be a source of lead exposure compared to deteriorating or damaged surfaces, which might release lead dust or chips. In situations where a risk assessor is charging based on the number of samples collected, prioritizing samples from areas that are more likely to present a lead hazard is crucial.

Additionally, sampling intact surfaces can help in evaluating the overall condition of the property and determining if lead paint is present in high-risk areas. It is essential to focus on surfaces that might actually contribute to lead exposure rather than just gathering samples indiscriminately. Hence, prioritizing the condition and usage of the surfaces being sampled ensures that the assessment is thorough and targets areas of higher concern regarding lead risk.